<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=30466"><dc:title>Introduction of a spectrophotometric method for salivary iodine determination on microplate based on Sandell-Kolthoff reaction</dc:title><dc:creator>Oblak,	Adrijana	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Imperl,	Jernej	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kolar,	Mitja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Marolt,	Gregor	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Krhin,	Blaž	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zaletel,	Katja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gaberšček,	Simona	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>iodine</dc:subject><dc:subject>salivary iodine concentration</dc:subject><dc:subject>Sandell-Kolthoff reaction</dc:subject><dc:description>Background. Iodine is an essential element for the synthesis of thyroid hormones. Therefore, a reliable marker of iodine supply is important. Iodine is predominantly excreted via kidneys, but also via salivary glands. Our aim was to introduce a new and simple method for determination of salivary iodine concentration (SLIC). Materials and methods. Self-prepared chemicals and standards for Sandell-Kolthoff reaction on microplate with ammonium peroxydisulfate (AP) in the range 0−400 µg/L were used. Suitability of water-based standards (WBS) and artificial saliva-based standards (ASS) for standard curve were tested. We followed standards for method validation, defined concentration of used AP and compared our results with Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS). Results. WBS gave more reliable results than ASS as an underestimation of iodine concentration was found for ASS. LoB was 6.5 µg/L, LoD 12.0 µg/L, therefore analytical range was 12−400 µg/L. Intra- and inter-assay imprecisions at iodine concentrations, namely 20, 100, 165, and 350 µg/L were 18.4, 5.1, 5.7, and 2.8%, respectively, and 20.7, 6.7, 5.1, and 4.3%, respectively. Suitable molarity of AP was 1.0 mol/L and showed no difference to 1.5 mol/L (P values for samples with concentration 40, 100, and 150 µg/L, were 0.761, 0.085, and 0.275, respectively), whereas there was a significant change using 0.5 mol/L (P&lt;0.001). Saliva samples could be diluted up to 1:8. There was no interference of thiocyanate and caffeine up to 193.5 mg/L. Our original method was comparable to ICP-MS. Spaerman coefficient was 0.989 (95% CI: 0.984−0.993). Conclusions. The new method for SLIC determination is in excellent agreement with ICP-MS and easy-to-use.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Association of Radiology and Oncology</dc:publisher><dc:date>2024</dc:date><dc:date>2026-06-26 13:56:57</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>30466</dc:identifier><dc:source>Ljubljana</dc:source><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
