<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=29348"><dc:title>SABER</dc:title><dc:creator>Chou,	Shih-Kai	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zhao,	Mengran	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hu,	Cheng-Nan	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Chou,	Kuang-Chung	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Fortuna,	Carolina	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hribar,	Jernej	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>angle of arrival</dc:subject><dc:subject>estimation</dc:subject><dc:subject>reconfigurable intelligent surface</dc:subject><dc:subject>symbolic regression</dc:subject><dc:description>Accurate angle-of-arrival (AoA) estimation is essential for next-generation wireless communication systems to enable reliable beamforming, high-precision localization, and integrated sensing. Unfortunately, classical high-resolution techniques require multielement arrays and extensive snapshot collection, while generic machine-learning (ML) approaches often yield black-box models that lack physical interpretability. To address these limitations, we propose a symbolic regression (SR)-based ML framework. Namely, symbolic regression-based angle of arrival and beam pattern estimator (SABER), a constrained SR framework that automatically discovers closed-form beam pattern and AoA models from path loss measurements with interpretability. SABER achieves high accuracy while bridging the gap between opaque ML methods and interpretable physics-driven estimators. First, we validate our approach in a controlled free-space anechoic chamber, showing that both direct inversion of the known cos[sup]n beam and a low-order polynomial surrogate achieve sub-0.5° mean absolute error (MAE). A purely unconstrained SR method can further reduce the error of the predicted angles, but produces complex formulas that lack physical insight. Then, we implement the same SR-learned inversions in a real-world, reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-aided indoor testbed. SABER and unconstrained SR models accurately recover the true AoA with near-zero error. Finally, we benchmark SABER against the Cramér–Rao lower bounds (CRLBs). Our results demonstrate that SABER is an interpretable and accurate alternative to state-of-the-art and black-box ML-based methods for AoA estimation.</dc:description><dc:publisher>IEEE</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-05-11 13:14:35</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>29348</dc:identifier><dc:source>ZDA</dc:source><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:rights>© 2026 The Authors.</dc:rights></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
