<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=28862"><dc:title>The significance of isolated de novo red patches in the bladder in patients referred with suspected urinary tract cancer</dc:title><dc:creator>Khadhouri,	Sinan	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gallagher,	Kevin M	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>MacKenzie,	Kenneth R.	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Shah,	Taimur T.	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gao,	Chuanyu	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kondža,	Andraž	(Sodelavec pri raziskavi)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hawlina,	Simon	(Sodelavec pri raziskavi)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Smrkolj,	Tomaž	(Sodelavec pri raziskavi)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bele,	Uroš	(Sodelavec pri raziskavi)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>biopsy</dc:subject><dc:subject>bladder cancer</dc:subject><dc:subject>cystoscopy</dc:subject><dc:subject>haematuria</dc:subject><dc:subject>red patch</dc:subject><dc:subject>risk factors</dc:subject><dc:description>Objectives: To assess the contemporary malignancy rate in isolated de novo red patchesin the bladder and associated risk factors for better selection of red patch biopsy.Patients: Patients from the IDENTIFY dataset; Patients referred to secondary carewith suspected urinary tract cancer and found to have isolated de novo red patcheson cystoscopy.Methods: We reported the unadjusted cancer prevalence in isolated de novo redpatches that were biopsied; multivariable logistic regression was used to explorecancer-associated risk factors including age, sex, smoking, type of haematuria, LUTS,UTIs and a suspicious-looking red patch (as reported by the cystoscopist). Sub-analysis of these by clinical role and experience was performed.Results: A total of 1110 patients with isolated de novo red patches were included.41.5% (n = 461) were biopsied, with a malignancy rate of 12.8% (59/461), whichwas significantly higher in suspicious versus non-suspicious red patches (19.1%vs. 2.81%, p &lt; 0.01). There was a significant association between bladder cancer andage (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.07, p = 0.01), smoking history (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.09–6.27, p = 0.03) and suspicious-looking patch (OR 6.50, 95% CI 2.47–17.1, p &lt; 0.01).The majority of malignancies were in over 60-year-olds. Malignancy rates in suspicious versus non-suspicious red patches did not differ significantly betweenclinical roles or experiences.Limitations included subjectivity in classifying a suspicious patch and selection biasas not all patches were biopsied.Conclusions: Many patients still undergo unnecessary biopsies under general anaes-thetic for isolated de novo red patches. Clinicians should consider the patient’s age,smoking status and how suspicious-looking the patch is, before deciding on surveil-lance versus biopsy to improve cancer diagnostic yield.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2026-04-09 14:25:00</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>28862</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
