<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=28782"><dc:title>A comparative study of the gross alpha and beta sample preparation method with a liquid scintillation counter</dc:title><dc:creator>Rovan Stiplošek,	Leja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Patterson,	Sian	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>radioecology</dc:subject><dc:subject>gross alpha and beta</dc:subject><dc:subject>pre-concentration methods</dc:subject><dc:subject>liquid-scintillation counting</dc:subject><dc:subject>recovery</dc:subject><dc:subject>zeta-score</dc:subject><dc:description>Gross alpha and beta (GAB) measurements provide a rapid screening tool for assessing radionuclide contamination in water. This study aimed to establish a sensitive, simple method for low-level GAB detection using a liquid scintillation counter (LSC). Different sample preparation approaches (direct, co-precipitation with Fe(OH)3, Ca3(PO4)2, MnO2, and evaporation) were tested on four water samples containing natural and anthropogenic radionuclides from the IAEA 2022 proficiency test. Results, evaluated by recoveries and Zeta-scores, showed preparation methods influence recovery and quenching. Co-precipitation with Ca3(PO4)2 and evaporation performed best, though GAB remains a complementary rather than absolute analytical method, as not all radionuclides can be detected simultaneously.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Springer Nature</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-04-07 11:50:59</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>28782</dc:identifier><dc:source>Švica</dc:source><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:rights>© The Author(s) 2026</dc:rights></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
