<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=27828"><dc:title>Analyses of the development and challenges of parkour coaches’ education in Europe</dc:title><dc:creator>Kolar,	Edvard	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pišot,	Rado	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Veličković,	Saša	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cikač,	Ana	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>sport</dc:subject><dc:subject>parkour</dc:subject><dc:subject>coaches</dc:subject><dc:subject>education</dc:subject><dc:subject>training</dc:subject><dc:subject>institutionalization</dc:subject><dc:subject>formalization</dc:subject><dc:description>Purpose: Parkour historically developed as an urban community “lifestyle” move-ment that relied mainly on informal teaching and training methodologies. With formal institutionalization, parkour has transitioned into more formalized structures, includ-ing established training academies, coaching certifications, and competitive events. This article presents a structured literature review with the aim of providing an over-view of the historical, philosophical/ideological, organizational/institutional, and edu-cational aspects of parkour coach education and knowledge development in Europe. Based on the review, key challenges for future development are also highlighted.Method: For the purposes of a structured literature review, the search and selection process followed the general principles of the PRISMA 2020 statement as a framework, rather than a formal systematic review protocol. Google Scholar was chosen as the pri-mary search platform. Following the initial screening and analysis, 12 relevant sources were included in the in-depth review. In addition to the literature review, online sources from professional international sports organizations involved in education, training, and certification of parkour coaches were also examined. Findings: It can be noted that parkour in Europe is still predominantly developed and understood as a “lifestyle” urban activity with the gradual parallel formation of an institutional, formal sports discipline, which is reflected in the intra-organizational and philosophical-ideological conflict between participants and (opinion) leaders of parkour. These conflicts are also evident at the level of training/education of parkour coaches and instructors.Conclusions: Recognizing and respecting parkour’s roots as a self-organized cul-ture is essential if institutionalization is to enhance rather than diminish the discipline’s diversity, creativity, and authenticity.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2026-02-26 08:34:54</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>27828</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:rights>Copyright (c) 2025 Edvard Kolar, Rado Pišot, Saša Veličković, Ana Cikač</dc:rights></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
