<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=27568"><dc:title>Blaustein’s Phenomenological Psychology</dc:title><dc:creator>Borek,	Filip	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>phenomenal world</dc:subject><dc:subject>phenomenology</dc:subject><dc:subject>hyletics</dc:subject><dc:subject>psychology</dc:subject><dc:subject>Blaustein</dc:subject><dc:subject>Husserl</dc:subject><dc:subject>Stumpf</dc:subject><dc:description>The article explores the idea of psychology and phenomenology in Blaustein’s writings as well as its relation to two conceptions of phenomenology: Husserl’s and Stumpf ’s, respectively. The article is divided into five sections. In section 1, a historical background of the reception of Husserl’s and Stumpf ’s ideas in Blaustein is discussed. Section 2 concerns the conception of phenomenology in Husserl and in Stumpf regarding its subject matter. Section 3 discusses the ambivalent status of phenomenology in Blaustein’s theoretical project. Section 4 confronts Blaustein’s understanding of phenomenology with that of Husserl and of Stumpf. Section 5 summarizes the discussion of the similarities and differences between Blaustein, on the one hand, and Husserl and Stumpf, on the other hand. I argue that with regard to the question of the subject matter of phenomenology, Blaustein is closer to Husserl’s phenomenology rather than Stumpf ’s.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2026-02-13 12:42:55</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>27568</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
