<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=27408"><dc:title>A remark on a result on odd colorings of planar graphs</dc:title><dc:creator>Pradhan,	Dinabandhu	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sharma,	Vaishali	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Škrekovski,	Riste	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>coloring</dc:subject><dc:subject>odd coloring</dc:subject><dc:subject>planar graphs</dc:subject><dc:description>A proper ▫$k$▫-coloring of a graph is said to be odd if every non-isolated vertex has a color that appears an odd number of times on its neighborhood. Miao et al. (2024) [2] claimed that every planar graph without adjacent ▫$3$▫-cycles is odd ▫$7$▫-colorable and every triangle-free planar graph without intersecting ▫$4$▫-cycles is odd ▫$5$▫-colorable. Here, we point out that their published proof contains a fundamental flaw which affects the validity of the main results.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-02-05 15:43:25</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>27408</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:rights>© 2026 The Author(s)</dc:rights></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
