<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=27407"><dc:title>Remarks on proper conflict-free degree-choosability of graphs with prescribed degeneracy</dc:title><dc:creator>Kashima,	Masaki	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Škrekovski,	Riste	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Xu,	Rongxing	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>proper conflict-free coloring</dc:subject><dc:subject>list coloring</dc:subject><dc:subject>degree-choosability</dc:subject><dc:subject>degeneracy</dc:subject><dc:description>A proper coloring ▫$\phi$▫ of ▫$G$▫ is called a proper conflict-free coloring of ▫$G$▫ if for every non-isolated vertex ▫$v$▫ of ▫$G$▫, there is a color ▫$c$▫ such that ▫$|\phi^{-1}(c) \cap N_G(v)| = 1$▫. As an analogy of degree-choosability of graphs, we introduced the notion of proper conflict-free (degree ▫$+k$▫)-choosability of graphs. For a non-negative integer ▫$k$▫, a graph ▫$G$▫ is proper conflict-free (degree ▫$+k$▫)-choosable if for any list assignment ▫$L$▫ of ▫$G$▫ with ▫$|L(v)| \ge d_G(v) + k$▫ for every vertex ▫$v \in V(G)$▫, ▫$G$▫ admits a proper conflict-free coloring ▫$\phi$▫ such that ▫$\phi(v) \in L(v)$▫ for every vertex ▫$v \in V(G)$▫. In this note, we first remark if a graph ▫$G$▫ is ▫$d$▫-degenerate, then ▫$G$▫ is proper conflict-free (degree ▫$+d+1$▫)-choosable. Furthermore, when ▫$d=1$▫, we can reduce the number of colors by showing that every tree is proper conflict-free (degree ▫$+1$▫)-choosable. This motivates us to state a question.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-02-05 15:39:34</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>27407</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:rights>© 2026 The Authors</dc:rights></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
