<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=27009"><dc:title>The role of policymakers and businesses in advancing the forest-based bioeconomy</dc:title><dc:creator>Plevnik,	Kaja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Japelj,	Anže	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>forest-based bioeconomy</dc:subject><dc:subject>forest ecosystem services</dc:subject><dc:subject>stakeholders’ positions</dc:subject><dc:subject>policymakers</dc:subject><dc:subject>businesses</dc:subject><dc:subject>payments for ecosystem services</dc:subject><dc:subject>PES</dc:subject><dc:subject>market potential</dc:subject><dc:description>We examined the positions of policymakers and businesses on the forest-based bioeconomy (FBE) in Slovenia, focusing on the importance of forest ecosystem services within the FBE. We also explored how businesses perceive their market potential and the role of payments for ecosystem services (PES) schemes in strengthening the FBE. We conducted interviews with 35 policymakers from the fields of forestry, the wood industry, the environment, and tourism, as well as with 24 business representatives from primary wood production, the wood industry, and forest tourism. Respondents identified fragmented land ownership (mean score on a 1–5 scale = 4.19), the lack of a strategic framework (4.12), and inefficient use of woody biomass (4.08) as key challenges to implementing the FBE in Slovenia. They highlighted knowledge transfer (4.54), investment support (4.47), and raising environmental awareness (4.44) as the main forms of state support for the FBE, while unfamiliarity with PES appears to contribute to its neglect. No significant sectoral differences were observed among policymakers regarding PES involvement; however, they viewed their role mainly in the design phase of PES and least in the phases of coordination and establishment. Greater interest in participating in PES was expressed by forest tourism businesses, despite perceiving lower market potential than those in primary wood production and the wood industry. The evident heterogeneity of stakeholder positions on the FBE calls for strong coordination and a transparent policy process involving all stakeholder coalitions to establish a coherent national strategy for the FBE. The results highlighted policymakers’ limited governance capacity and reluctance to fully implement PES as a potential solution for strengthening the FBE. The differing motivations of businesses regarding PES underscore the need for a nuanced, sector-specific approach to foster broader engagement.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-01-28 13:53:40</dc:date><dc:type>Znanstveno delo</dc:type><dc:identifier>27009</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
