<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=25169"><dc:title>Placebo rates in randomised clinical trials of ulcerative colitis</dc:title><dc:creator>Solitano,	Virginia	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hogan,	Malcolm	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Singh,	Siddharth	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Danese,	Silvio	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Peyrin-Biroulet,	Laurent	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Vuyyuru,	Sudheer Kumar	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>MacDonald,	John K	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zou,	Guangyong	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hanžel,	Jurij	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>inflammatory bowel disease</dc:subject><dc:subject>placebo effect</dc:subject><dc:subject>clinical trials</dc:subject><dc:subject>ulcerative colitis</dc:subject><dc:description>Background and aims: We assessed placebo rates and associated factors using individual patient data (IDP) from randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: We conducted an IPD meta-analysis using Vivli and Yale University Open Data Access data-sharing platforms. Phase 2 and 3 RCTs of advanced biologics in adults with moderate-to-severe UC published since 2010 were included. Pooled placebo rates and 95% CIs were estimated using one-and two-stage meta-analytical approaches. Significant patient-level factors (P &lt; 0·05) were identified using regression analyses. Primary outcomes were clinical response and remission. Results: Data were available for 1703 patients from nine studies. For induction trials, overall placebo response and remission rates were 33% (95% CI 29%–38%) and 9% (95% CI 7%–11%). Overall placebo response and remission rates in maintenance trials were 28% (95% CI 18%–41%) and 14% (95% CI 9%–20%). A lower body mass index reduced odds of placebo response and remission, while higher baseline albumin levels and left-sided (compared to extensive) UC increased the odds of these outcomes. A one-point increase in the Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) and adapted MCS was associated with a 26% and 27% reduction in odds of clinical remission. For induction trials, prior biologic exposure was associated with lower odds of response and remission. Multi-centre trials have lower placebo effects than single-centre trials. Conclusions: These results enable future trials to incorporate design elements that reduce placebo rates as well as a precise benchmark for expected rates in clinical trials that do not include placebo.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2026-01-13 08:59:26</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>25169</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
