<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=25159"><dc:title>Did I Just See Romeo Commit Suicide?</dc:title><dc:creator>Jakha,	Hicham	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>Alexius Meinong</dc:subject><dc:subject>Leopold Blaustein</dc:subject><dc:subject>theater</dc:subject><dc:subject>phenomenology</dc:subject><dc:subject>ontology</dc:subject><dc:description>I analyze the aesthetic experience of theatergoers in light of Meinong’s “assumptions” and Blaustein’s “imaginative presentations,” taking Brentano’s “universality thesis” as the background of my analyses. I argue that “presentations” and “judgments” go hand in hand, as far as theater experience is concerned. To put forth my main argument, I follow a two-fold line of reasoning: phenomenological and ontological. On the phenomenological level, Blaustein’s imaginative presentations, I argue, are self-sufficient. Nonetheless, on the ontological level, the theater’s represented objects emerge as having a two-sided structure that undermines the phenomenological simplicity of presentations. By characterizing represented objects’ ontology in this manner, I admit Meinong’s assumptions as a fourth class of mental phenomena, and, beyond the frameworks of both Meinong and Blaustein, incorporate judgments into the aesthetic experience of theater.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2026-01-13 03:44:42</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>25159</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
