<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=24951"><dc:title>A comment on “On the futility of the Fuoss–Kirkwood relation”</dc:title><dc:creator>Gradišar,	Žiga	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Boškoski,	Pavle	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>distribution of relaxation times</dc:subject><dc:subject>Fuoss–Kirkwood relation</dc:subject><dc:subject>equivalent circuit models</dc:subject><dc:description>Recently a point was made in this journal, that the well-known relation — the Fuoss–Kirkwood formula — between impedance of a causal, linear device and the pertaining distribution of relaxation times is futile. We point-out the incorrect use of relation and provide evidence that the formula is applicable when used correctly.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-01-05 12:38:14</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>24951</dc:identifier><dc:source>Nizozemska</dc:source><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:rights>© 2025 The Authors.</dc:rights></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>