<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=24478"><dc:title>Comparison of self-collected and healthcare worker-collected rectovaginal swabs for group B streptococcus detection in pregnancy using PCR with a commercial collection-enrichment device</dc:title><dc:creator>Kukovica,	Iva	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Omahen,	Neža	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Klobučar,	Nika	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bučar,	Martina	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Franko Rutar,	Anita	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Perme,	Tina	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lučovnik,	Miha	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Jeverica,	Samo	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>group B streptococcus</dc:subject><dc:subject>self-collection</dc:subject><dc:subject>enrichment culture</dc:subject><dc:subject>PCR</dc:subject><dc:subject>chromogenic agar</dc:subject><dc:subject>pregnancy</dc:subject><dc:subject>screening</dc:subject><dc:description>Introduction: Universal screening for the detection of group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization in pregnant women was recently introduced in Slovenia. The aim of our study was to determine whether self-collection of rectovaginal swabs is a valid alternative to collection by healthcare workers (HCWs). Methods: A prospective, multicenter study was conducted between June and November 2023. A total of 227 pregnant women (aged 20 to 44 years) from the University Medical Center Ljubljana (n = 136), the Novo mesto Community Health Center (n = 48) and the Trebnje Community Health Center (n = 43) were included. Two swabs were taken: swab A by the HCWs using standard semi-solid Amies transport medium (Meus; current standard) and swab B by the pregnant woman following visual instructions using a commercial LIM Broth (Copan). Swabs were inoculated onto ChromID Strepto B (STRB) agars directly and after overnight enrichment in LIM broth. The NeuMoDx GBS assay was performed from the enrichment broth. A self-assessment questionnaire was completed after sampling. Performance characteristics were calculated and compared between different diagnostics test algorithms using McNemar’s test for paired samples. Results: Overall, GBS was detected in 18% (95% CI 13–23%; n = 40) of swabs A and 19% (95% CI 14–25%; n = 43) of swabs B. PCR was superior in both groups. In the group of swabs collected by HCWs, 4 (40 vs. 36; 11.1% difference; p = 0.046) and 3 (40 vs. 37; 8.1% difference; p = 0.083) additional positives were detected with PCR compared to direct and enrichment culture, respectively; in the group of self-collected swabs, 4 (43 vs. 39; 10.3% difference; p = 0.046) and 6 (43 vs. 36; 16.2% difference; p = 0.014) additional positives were detected with PCR compared to direct and enrichment culture, respectively. Self-collection showed a trend towards a higher diagnostic yield. PCR after enrichment from self-collected samples was found to be the most. sensitive method overall. 58.5% (n = 124/212; 95% CI 52–65%) of women would prefer the swabs taken by HCWs. Discussion: Self-collection of rectovaginal swabs during pregnancy is a good alternative to HCW-collected swabs. PCR from enrichment broth was better for the detection of GBS compared to enrichment culture. Majority of women preferred swabs taken by HCWs.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2025-12-01 13:48:30</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>24478</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
