<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=24108"><dc:title>Prophylactic treatment of hepatitis C virus infection after kidney transplantation with the combination of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and sofosbuvir in a highly sensitized hepatitis c virus-negative recipient</dc:title><dc:creator>Belčič Mikič,	Tanja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sterle,	Igor	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Matičič,	Mojca	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Arnol,	Miha	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>kidney transplantation</dc:subject><dc:subject>HCV RNA</dc:subject><dc:subject>direct-acting antiviral (DAA)</dc:subject><dc:subject>glecaprevir/pibrentasvir</dc:subject><dc:subject>sensitization</dc:subject><dc:subject>case report</dc:subject><dc:description>Background: Since the discovery of successful direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment, kidneys from hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA-positive donors represent a new opportunity to expand the organ donor pool for HCV-negative recipients. Case presentation: In this paper, we describe a unique case of transplantation of an HCV genotype 3a-infected kidney into an HCV-negative recipient who was highly sensitized, with a virtual panel-reactive antibody level of 99.96%. Prior to the kidney transplantation, the recipient received DAA treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir as a viable prophylactic strategy. Post-transplant, the recipient received a triple-combination DAA regimen with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir/sofosbuvir, which continued for 12 weeks. Subsequently, viral load was undetectable at 12 and 24 weeks after treatment, with no significant adverse events associated with DAA therapy. A 12-month post-transplantation biopsy revealed mixed rejection requiring treatment. The 19-month follow-up showed a favorable outcome regarding the function of the kidney allograft and the recipient’s quality of life. HCV-positive transplantation allowed our recipient to receive a kidney from an immunologically compatible donor without donor-specific antibodies and the need for desensitization strategies. Conclusions: Each transplant center should decide on the selection of candidates for kidney transplantation from HCV RNA-positive donors to HCV-negative recipients, the availability and choice of DAA treatment, and post-transplant follow-up. Our case emphasizes the need for early DAA treatment based on viral load and HCV genotyping, as well as for careful post-transplant surveillance including protocol biopsies.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2025-11-12 14:27:19</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>24108</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
