<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=23096"><dc:title>$k$-domination invariants on Kneser graphs</dc:title><dc:creator>Brešar,	Boštjan	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Dravec,	Tanja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cornet,	María Gracia	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Henning,	Michael A.	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>Kneser graphs</dc:subject><dc:subject>k-domination</dc:subject><dc:subject>k-tuple total domination</dc:subject><dc:subject>2-packing</dc:subject><dc:description>In this follow-up to work of M.G. Cornet and P. Torres from 2023, where the $k$-tuple domination number and the $2$-packing number in Kneser graphs $K(n,r)$ were studied, we are concerned with two variations, the $k$-domination number, $\gamma_k(K(n,r))$, and the $k$-tuple total domination number, $\gamma_{t\times k}(K(n,r))$, of $K(n,r)$. For both invariants we prove monotonicity results by showing that $\gamma_k(K(n,r))\ge \gamma_k(K(n+1,r))$  holds for any $n\ge 2(k+r)$, and $\gamma_{t\times k}(K(n,r))\ge \gamma_{t\times k}(K(n+1,r))$ holds for any $n\ge 2r+1$. We prove that $\gamma_k(K(n,r))= \gamma_{t\times k}(K(n,r))= k+r$ when $n\geq r(k+r)$, and that in this case every $\gamma_k$-set and $\gamma_{t\times k}$-set is a clique, while $\gamma_k(r(k+r)-1,r)=\gamma_{t\times k}(r(k+r)-1,r)=k+r+1$, for any $k\ge 2$. Concerning the $2$-packing number, $\rho_2(K(n,r))$, of $K(n,r)$, we prove the exact values of $\rho_2(K(3r-3,r))$ when $r\ge 10$, and give sufficient conditions for $\rho_2(K(n,r))$ to be equal to some small values by imposing bounds on $r$ with respect to $n$. We also prove a version of monotonicity for the $2$-packing number of Kneser graphs.
</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2025-07-24 13:34:10</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>23096</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
