<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=19623"><dc:title>Diagnostic performance of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining at different number of positive cells in cervical smears in women referred for colposcopy</dc:title><dc:creator>Salobir Gajšek,	Uršula	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Dovnik,	Andraž	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Takač,	Iztok	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ivanuš,	Urška	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Jerman,	Tine	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Šramek Zatler,	Simona	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Repše-Fokter,	Alenka	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>cervical cytology</dc:subject><dc:subject>high-grade dysplasia</dc:subject><dc:subject>p16/Ki-67 immunostaining</dc:subject><dc:description>. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (p16/ Ki-67 DS) in cervical cytology and the number of positive p16/Ki-67 cells to diagnose high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) in colposcopy population. Subjects and methods. We performed an analysis on a subset cohort of 174 women enrolled within a large-scale randomised controlled human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling project organised as part of the population-based Cervical Cancer Screening Programme ZORA in Slovenia. This subset cohort of patients was invited to the colposcopy clinic, underwent p16/Ki-67 DS cervical cytology and had the number of p16/Ki-67 positive cells determined. Results. Among analysed women, 42/174 (24.1%) had histologically confirmed CIN2+. The risk for CIN2+ was increasing with the number of positive cells (p &lt; 0.001). The sensitivity of p16/Ki-67 DS for detection of CIN2+ was 88.1%, specificity was 65.2%, positive predictive value was 44.6% and negative predictive value was 94.5%. Conclusions. Dual p16/Ki-67 immunostaining for the detection of CIN2+ has shown high sensitivity and high negative predictive value in our study, which is comparable to available published data. The number of p16/Ki-67 positive cells was significantly associated with the probability of CIN2+ detection. We observed a statistically significant and clinically relevant increase in specificity if the cut-off for a positive test was shifted from one cell to three cells.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Association of Radiology and Oncology</dc:publisher><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:date>2024-07-22 15:12:33</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>19623</dc:identifier><dc:source>Ljubljana</dc:source><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:rights>by Authors</dc:rights></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
