Digitalni repozitorij raziskovalnih organizacij Slovenije

Izpis gradiva
A+ | A- | Pomoč | SLO | ENG

Naslov:Consistency of impact assessment protocols for non-native species
Avtorji:ID González-Moreno, Pablo (Avtor)
ID Lazzaro, Lorenzo (Avtor)
ID Vila, Montserrat (Avtor)
ID Preda, Cristina (Avtor)
ID Adriaens, Tim (Avtor)
ID Bacher, Sven (Avtor)
ID Brundu, Giuseppe (Avtor)
ID Copp, Gordon H. (Avtor)
ID Essl, Franz (Avtor)
ID Ogris, Nikica (Avtor)
Datoteke:.pdf PDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (1,55 MB)
MD5: D0519D7F7EF37BF9C600ADB1BFA7AC73
 
URL URL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite https://neobiota.pensoft.net/article/31650/
 
Jezik:Angleški jezik
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:Logo SciVie - Gozdarski inštitut Slovenije
Povzetek:Standardized tools are needed to identify and prioritize the most harmful non-native species (NNS). A plethora of assessment protocols have been developed to evaluate the current and potential impacts of non-native species, but consistency among them has received limited attention. To estimate the consistency across impact assessment protocols, 89 specialists in biological invasions used 11 protocols to screen 57 NNS (2614 assessments). We tested if the consistency in the impact scoring across assessors, quantified as the coefficient of variation (CV), was dependent on the characteristics of the protocol, the taxonomic group and the expertise of the assessor. Mean CV across assessors was 40%, with a maximum of 223%. CV was lower for protocols with a low number of score levels, which demanded high levels of expertise, and when the assessors had greater expertise on the assessed species. The similarity among protocols with respect to the final scores was higher when the protocols considered the same impact types. We conclude that all protocols led to considerable inconsistency among assessors. In order to improve consistency, we highlight the importance of selecting assessors with high expertise, providing clear guidelines and adequate training but also deriving final decisions collaboratively by consensus.
Ključne besede:environmental impact, expert judgement, invasive alien species policy, management prioritization, risk assessment, socio-economic impact
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Verzija publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Leto izida:2019
Št. strani:str. 1-25
Številčenje:44
PID:20.500.12556/DiRROS-9432 Novo okno
UDK:630*44:630*44
ISSN pri članku:1314-2488
DOI:10.3897/neobiota.44.31650 Novo okno
COBISS.SI-ID:5356454 Novo okno
Opomba:Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 2. 4. 2019; Avtor iz Slovenije: Nikica Ogris;
Datum objave v DiRROS:03.04.2019
Število ogledov:2211
Število prenosov:972
Metapodatki:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
  
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share


Postavite miškin kazalec na naslov za izpis povzetka. Klik na naslov izpiše podrobnosti ali sproži prenos.

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:NeoBiota
Skrajšan naslov:NeoBiota
Založnik:Pensoft Publishers
ISSN:1314-2488
COBISS.SI-ID:522028825 Novo okno

Licence

Licenca:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:To je standardna licenca Creative Commons, ki daje uporabnikom največ možnosti za nadaljnjo uporabo dela, pri čemer morajo navesti avtorja.
Začetek licenciranja:22.01.2021

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Ni določen
Ključne besede:vpliv na okolje, strokovna ocena, invazivne tujerodne vrste, politika, ukrepanje, ocena tveganja, družbeno ekonomski vpliv


Nazaj