skip to main content
10.1145/3583131.3590401acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

DynamoRep: Trajectory-Based Population Dynamics for Classification of Black-box Optimization Problems

Published:12 July 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The application of machine learning (ML) models to the analysis of optimization algorithms requires the representation of optimization problems using numerical features. These features can be used as input for ML models that are trained to select or to configure a suitable algorithm for the problem at hand. Since in pure black-box optimization information about the problem instance can only be obtained through function evaluation, a common approach is to dedicate some function evaluations for feature extraction, e.g., using random sampling. This approach has two key downsides: (1) It reduces the budget left for the actual optimization phase, and (2) it neglects valuable information that could be obtained from a problem-solver interaction.

In this paper, we propose a feature extraction method that describes the trajectories of optimization algorithms using simple descriptive statistics. We evaluate the generated features for the task of classifying problem classes from the Black Box Optimization Benchmarking (BBOB) suite. We demonstrate that the proposed DynamoRep features capture enough information to identify the problem class on which the optimization algorithm is running, achieving a mean classification accuracy of 95% across all experiments.

References

  1. Nacim Belkhir, Johann Dréo, Pierre Savéant, and Marc Schoenauer. 2017. Per instance algorithm configuration of CMA-ES with limited budget. In Proc. of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO). ACM, 681--688. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Hans-Georg Beyer and Hans-Paul Schwefel. 2002. Evolution strategies-a comprehensive introduction. Natural computing 1 (2002), 3--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Blank and K. Deb. 2020. pymoo: Multi-Objective Optimization in Python. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 89497--89509.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Gjorgjina Cenikj, Ryan Dieter Lang, Andriess Petrus Engelbrecht, Carola Doerr, Peter Korošec, and Tome Eftimov. 2022. SELECTOR: Selecting a Representative Benchmark Suite for Reproducible Statistical Comparison. In Proceedings of The Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. In Press..Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gabriele Corso, Luca Cavalleri, Dominique Beaini, Pietro Liò, and Petar Veličković. 2020. Principal neighbourhood aggregation for graph nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020), 13260--13271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hossein Gholamalinezhad and Hossein Khosravi. 2020. Pooling methods in deep neural networks, a review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.07485 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Léo Grinsztajn, Edouard Oyallon, and Gaël Varoquaux. 2022. Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data? arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.08815 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Nikolaus Hansen. 2016. The CMA evolution strategy: A tutorial. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.00772 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nikolaus Hansen, Anne Auger, Raymond Ros, Olaf Mersmann, Tea Tušar, and Dimo Brockhoff. 2020. COCO: A platform for comparing continuous optimizers in a black-box setting. Optimization Methods and Software (2020), 1--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Nikolaus Hansen, Steffen Finck, Raymond Ros, and Anne Auger. 2009. Real-Parameter Black-Box Optimization Benchmarking 2009: Noiseless Functions Definitions. Research Report RR-6829. INRIA. https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00362633Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Nikolaus Hansen and Andreas Ostermeier. 1996. Adapting arbitrary normal mutation distributions in evolution strategies: The covariance matrix adaptation. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation. IEEE, 312--317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Anja Janković and Carola Doerr. 2019. Adaptive Landscape Analysis. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion (Prague, Czech Republic) (GECCO '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2032--2035. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Anja Jankovic, Tome Eftimov, and Carola Doerr. 2021. Towards Feature-Based Performance Regression Using Trajectory Data. In Proc. of Applications of Evolutionary Computation (EvoApplications 2021) (LNCS, Vol. 12694). Springer, 601--617. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sourabh Katoch, Sumit Singh Chauhan, and Vijay Kumar. 2021. A review on genetic algorithm: past, present, and future. Multimedia Tools and Applications 80 (2021), 8091--8126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Pascal Kerschke, Holger H. Hoos, Frank Neumann, and Heike Trautmann. 2019. Automated Algorithm Selection: Survey and Perspectives. Evolutionary Computation 27, 1 (2019), 3--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Pascal Kerschke and Heike Trautmann. 2019. Comprehensive Feature-Based Landscape Analysis of Continuous and Constrained Optimization Problems Using the R-Package Flacco. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 93--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ana Kostovska, Anja Jankovic, Diederick Vermetten, Jacob de Nobel, Hao Wang, Tome Eftimov, and Carola Doerr. 2022. Per-run Algorithm Selection with Warm-starting using Trajectory-based Features. LNCS, Vol. 13398. Springer, 46--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ryan Dieter Lang and Andries Petrus Engelbrecht. 2021. An Exploratory Landscape Analysis-Based Benchmark Suite. Algorithms 14, 3 (2021). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Katherine M. Malan and Andries P. Engelbrecht. 2013. A survey of techniques for characterising fitness landscapes and some possible ways forward. Information Sciences 241 (2013), 148--163. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Olaf Mersmann, Bernd Bischl, Heike Trautmann, Mike Preuss, Claus Weihs, and Günter Rudolph. 2011. Exploratory landscape analysis. In Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation. 829--836.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mario Andrés Muñoz and Kate Smith-Miles. 2020. Generating New Space-Filling Test Instances for Continuous Black-Box Optimization. Evolutionary Computation 28 (09 2020), 379--404. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Millie Pant, Hira Zaheer, Laura Garcia-Hernandez, Ajith Abraham, et al. 2020. Differential Evolution: A review of more than two decades of research. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 90 (2020), 103479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011), 2825--2830.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Gašper Petelin, Gjorgjina Cenikj, and Tome Eftimov. 2022. TLA: Topological Landscape Analysis for Single-Objective Continuous Optimization Problem Instances. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium Series On Computational Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Quentin Renau, Carola Doerr, Johann Dreo, and Benjamin Doerr. 2020. Exploratory Landscape Analysis is Strongly Sensitive to the Sampling Strategy. 139--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Quentin Renau, Johann Dreo, Carola Doerr, and Benjamin Doerr. 2021. Towards Explainable Exploratory Landscape Analysis: Extreme Feature Selection for Classifying BBOB Functions. In Applications of Evolutionary Computation. Springer International Publishing, 17--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Moritz Vinzent Seiler, Raphael Patrick Prager, Pascal Kerschke, and Heike Trautmann. 2022. A Collection of Deep Learning-Based Feature-Free Approaches for Characterizing Single-Objective Continuous Fitness Landscapes. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (Boston, Massachusetts) (GECCO '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 657--665. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Rainer Storn and Kenneth Price. 1997. Differential evolution-a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of global optimization 11, 4 (1997), 341--359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Boris Yazmir and Ofer M. Shir. 2021. Automated Feature Detection of Black-Box Continuous Search-Landscapes Using Neural Image Recognition. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion (Lille, France) (GECCO '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 213--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Urban Škvorc, Tome Eftimov, and Peter Korošec. 2020. Understanding the problem space in single-objective numerical optimization using exploratory landscape analysis. Applied Soft Computing 90 (2020), 106138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Urban Škvorc, Tome Eftimov, and Peter Korošec. 2021. The Effect of Sampling Methods on the Invariance to Function Transformations When Using Exploratory Landscape Analysis. In 2021 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC). 1139--1146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. DynamoRep: Trajectory-Based Population Dynamics for Classification of Black-box Optimization Problems

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GECCO '23: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
          July 2023
          1667 pages
          ISBN:9798400701191
          DOI:10.1145/3583131

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 July 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

          Upcoming Conference

          GECCO '24
          Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
          July 14 - 18, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader